Index > Vol. 85/2005 > Iss. 2/March > pp. 147-151 > Abstract
 

Atopy Patch Test - Reproducibility and Elicitation of Itch in Different Application Sites

doi: 10.1080/00015550410024418

Abstract:

We evaluated the reproducibility of atopy patch test reactions and the quality and quantity of itch in 16 patients with atopic eczema and a history of a positive atopy patch test reaction, comparing three different application sites. The allergen was re-applied simultaneously on both forearms and the back. Intensity and quality of pruritus were evaluated using a visual analogue scale and the Eppendorf itch questionnaire, respectively. The atopy patch test reaction was highly reproducible, occurring in 15/16 (94%) patients. Pruritus was reported by 14/16 (88%) patients. There was no significant difference in either the intensity or quality of itch between the two forearms and the back (p>0.05). The mean peak visual analogue scale itch score was comparable across all three test sites (range 28.3-31.9). Regarding quantification of test reactions, a positive reaction was more frequent on the back (94% versus 69% on the arms) and the peak atopy patch test score was higher on the back compared with the arms (right forearm, p=0.0018 and left forearm, p=0.0683). Allergens should preferably be applied on the back for the atopy patch test. However, the atopy patch test can induce atopic itch irrespective of the application site.

Key words:

atopic eczema, atopy patch test, itch

References:

  1. Ring, J. Atopy: condition, disease or syndrome? Handbook of atopic eczema, 3-8 In: Ruzicka T, Ring J, Przybilla B, eds.
  2. Hanifin, J. M. Basic and clinical aspects of atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy, 1984; 52: 386-395
  3. Hanifin, J. M, Rajka, G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol, 1980; Suppl 114: 146-148
  4. Darsow, U, Ring, J. Airborne and dietary allergens in atopic eczema: a comprehensive review of diagnostic tests. Clin Exp Dermatol, 2000; 25: 544-551
  5. Morren, M. A, Przybilla, B, Bamelis, M, Heykants, B, Reynaers, A, Degreef, H. Atopic dermatitis: triggering factors. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1994; 31: 467-473
  6. Gondo, A, Saeki, N, Tokuda, Y. Challenge reactions in atopic dermatitis after percutaneous entry of mite antigen. Br J Dermatol, 1986; 115: 485-493
  7. Maurer, D, Ebner, C, Reininger, B, Fiebiger, E, Kraft, D, Kinet, J. P, et al, . The high affinity IgE receptor mediates IgE-dependent allergen presentation. J Immunol, 1995; 154: 6285-6290
  8. Mitchell, E. B, Crow, J, Chapman, M. D, Jouhal, S. S, Pope, F. M, Platts-Mills, T. A. Basophils in allergen-induced patch test sites in atopic dermatitis. Lancet, 1982; I: 127-130
  9. Darsow, U, Scharein, E, Simon, D, Walter, G, Bromm, B, Ring, J. New aspects of itch pathophysiology: component analysis of atopic itch using the 'Eppendorf Itch Questionnaire'. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 2001; 124: 326-331
  10. Darsow, U, Ring, J, Scharein, E, Bromm, B. Correlations between histamine-induced wheal, flare and itch. Arch Dermatol Res, 1996; 288: 436-441
  11. Darsow, U, Vieluf, D, Ring, J. Atopy patch test with different vehicles and allergen concentrations - an approach to standardization. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1995; 95: 677-684
  12. Langeveld-Wildschut, E. G, van Marion, A. M, Thepen, T, Mudde, G. C, Bruijnzeel, P. L, Bruijnzeel-Koomen, C. A. Evaluation of variables influencing the outcome of the atopy patch test. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 1995; 96: 66-73
  13. Brasch, J, Henseler, T, Aberer, W, Bäuerle, G, Frosch, P. J, Fuchs, T, et al, . Reproducibility of patch tests. A multicenter study of synchronous left- versus right-sided patch tests by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1994; 31: 584-591
  14. Mitchell, J, Maibach, H. I. Managing the excited skin syndrome: patch testing hyperirritable skin. Contact Dermatitis, 1997; 37: 193-199
  15. Deleuran, M, Ellingsen, A. R, Paludan, K, Schou, C, Thestrup-Pedersen, K. Purified Der p1 and p2 patch tests in patients with atopic dermatitis: evidence for both allergenicity and proteolytic irritancy. Acta Derm Venereol, 1998; 78: 241-243
  16. Shah, D, Hales, J, Cooper, D, Camp, R. Recognition of pathogenically relevant house dust mite hypersensitivity in adults with atopic dermatitis: a new approach? J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2002; 109: 1012-1018
  17. Memon, A. A, Friedmann, P. S. Studies on the reproducibility of allergic contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol, 1996; 134: 208-214
  18. Heinemann, C, Schliemann-Willers, S, Kelterer, D, Metzner, U, Kluge, K, Wigger-Alberti, W, et al, . The atopy patch test - reproducibility and comparison of different evaluation methods. Allergy, 2002; 57: 641-645
  19. Magnusson, B, Hersle, K. Patch test methods II. Regional variations of patch test responses. Acta Derm Venereol, 1965; 45: 257-261
  20. Koopman, L. P, van Strien, R. T, Kerkhof, M, Wijga, A, Smit, H. A, de Jongste, J. C, et al, . Prevention Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy (PIAMA) Study. Placebo-controlled trial of house dust mite-impermeable mattress covers: effect on symptoms in early childhood. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2002; 166: 307-313
  21. Gutgesell, C, Heise, S, Seubert, S, Seubert, A, Domhof, S, Brunner, E, et al, . Double-blind placebo-controlled house dust mite control measures in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol, 2001; 145: 70-74